Accredited investor is a legal status defined by the SEC, not a title anyone applies for. It's based on meeting an income threshold, over $200,000 individually or $300,000 jointly for the past two years, or a net worth threshold above $1 million excluding a primary residence. The status matters because certain private real estate offerings, including many DSTs and syndications, are only open to investors who qualify, on the theory that they can better absorb the risk of a less-regulated investment.
Private real estate offerings sold under SEC exemptions like Regulation D don't carry the same disclosure requirements as a public stock offering. Restricting them to accredited investors is meant to limit exposure to investors presumed to have the financial cushion and sophistication to evaluate a less-regulated deal, or at least the resources to withstand a loss without it being catastrophic. It's a blunt proxy for sophistication, income and net worth don't guarantee investment judgment, but it's the standard the SEC applies.
A sponsor or the platform hosting the offering typically requires documentation, tax returns or W-2s for income-based qualification, or bank and brokerage statements for net worth qualification, sometimes paired with a letter from a CPA, attorney, or registered investment advisor confirming the investor's status. This isn't a one-time check either, most sponsors require reverification for each new offering an investor participates in.
Publicly traded REITs remain open to any investor regardless of income or net worth, since they're registered securities with standard disclosure. Some Regulation A crowdfunding offerings and a limited number of non-traded REITs also accept non-accredited investors, typically with lower investment minimums and more restrictions on how much a single investor can commit. The tradeoff is usually a smaller universe of deals and, in some cases, less favorable terms than what's offered to accredited capital.
An El Paso investor exiting an appreciated property and considering a DST as replacement property will run into the accredited investor requirement directly, since most DST sponsors restrict their offerings this way. The exchange mechanics don't change based on accredited status, the same 45-day identification and 180-day closing deadlines apply, but the pool of eligible replacement DST offerings is narrower for an investor who doesn't qualify, which sometimes points toward a directly owned replacement property instead.
Some El Paso investors aren't accredited today but expect to qualify within a year or two, either through income growth or as an existing rental portfolio appreciates enough to push net worth over the threshold. For that investor, timing matters. An exchange deadline doesn't wait for accredited status to arrive mid-transaction, so an investor close to qualifying but not there yet at the time a property sells should plan the exchange around directly owned replacement property rather than assuming a DST will be reachable before the 180-day closing window runs out.
It's also worth noting that accredited status is assessed at the time of investment, not retroactively, and sponsors generally won't accept a subscription based on income or net worth an investor expects to have next year. Working with a CPA or advisor early in the exchange timeline, rather than after a property is already under contract to sell, gives more room to confirm status or adjust the replacement property strategy before deadlines start running.
Sponsors typically require documentation such as tax returns or W-2s to verify income, or bank and brokerage statements to verify net worth, sometimes along with written confirmation from a CPA, attorney, or investment advisor.
No, the SEC's $1 million net worth test specifically excludes the value of an investor's primary residence, so accredited status has to be established through other assets.
Yes, the joint income threshold of $300,000 can be met using combined income from both spouses over the past two years, with a reasonable expectation of the same in the current year.
The large majority are, since most are structured as private placements under SEC exemptions that require accredited status, though the specific requirement is set by each individual offering, not a blanket rule.
The exchange itself isn't restricted by accredited status, an investor who doesn't qualify simply has a narrower set of DST offerings available and would likely look at directly owned replacement property instead.