A sale leaseback runs a company's own building through a transaction that turns it from an owned asset into a rented one, in a single closing. The company sells its real estate to an investor and simultaneously signs a long-term lease to keep operating out of the same building. For the seller, it converts illiquid real estate equity into cash without moving the business. For the buyer, it's a way to acquire a tenant-in-place property with a lease negotiated at closing rather than inherited from a prior owner.
The most common reason is capital efficiency: a company operating a distribution center or manufacturing plant often gets a better return deploying that capital into its core business, inventory, equipment, expansion, than it does leaving it tied up in owned real estate. Some sale leasebacks happen for balance sheet reasons ahead of a refinancing or sale of the business, and others happen simply because a private owner wants to extract equity from a building without giving up operational control of the space.
Because the tenant and the party negotiating the lease terms are the same company that just sold the building, the initial rent and escalation schedule can be structured to serve the seller's accounting or cash flow goals rather than reflecting a market-rate lease negotiated between two arm's-length parties after the fact. That's not automatically a problem for the buyer, but it means comparing the in-place rent to genuinely comparable market rent for that building type and location is essential before treating a sale leaseback's headline cap rate as equivalent to a market-negotiated net lease.
Lease length and renewal structure matter more here than in most net lease deals, since the building is often purpose-built for the tenant's operation and harder to re-lease to a different user if the original tenant doesn't renew. Guaranty strength, corporate versus a thinly capitalized operating subsidiary, deserves the same scrutiny as any other net lease tenant. And because many sale leaseback buildings are single-purpose, a distribution facility with specialized racking, a manufacturing plant with heavy power and structural requirements, the re-tenanting cost if the lease ends should be modeled honestly rather than assumed away.
Renewal options set at a fixed rent, rather than one reset to fair market value, are worth flagging separately, since a below-market renewal option can cap the building's upside for years after the initial term closes. It's a detail easy to skim past in a summary flyer and expensive to discover only after closing.
Sale leaseback real estate held for investment qualifies as like-kind property in a 1031 exchange the same as any other net-leased asset, and the structure appeals to exchange buyers who want a longer initial lease term and a tenant with operational history in that specific building rather than one inherited mid-lease from a prior landlord. The exchange defers the capital gains tax on the relinquished property; it doesn't substitute for underwriting the tenant's credit and the building's re-leasing risk before that replacement property closes.
Most often for capital efficiency: the company would rather deploy that equity into its core business than leave it tied up in owned real estate, though some sale leasebacks happen for balance sheet or ownership-transition reasons instead.
Not on its own. Because the seller negotiates the lease it's about to sign as tenant, the initial rent can be structured to serve accounting or cash flow goals, so comparing in-place rent to genuinely comparable market rent is worth doing before relying on the headline cap rate.
Many are purpose-built for the seller's specific operation, a distribution center with specialized racking or a manufacturing plant with heavy power requirements, which narrows the pool of replacement tenants if the original tenant's lease ends.
The same way it's evaluated in any net lease deal: whether the lease is backed by the parent company's full credit or by a thinly capitalized operating subsidiary, since that distinction affects both financing terms and resale value.
Yes, sale leaseback real estate held for investment qualifies as like-kind property under 1031 rules, and its typically longer initial lease term is part of why it appeals to exchange buyers seeking durable income.